Technology is essential to how Medicaid operates — shaping how agencies support providers, manage complex programs, enable monitoring and compliance, and serve members. This episode of the Medicaid Leadership Exchange podcast explores how Medicaid leaders are approaching technology strategy and implementation. The discussion highlights how product roadmaps, shared governance, and stronger contract management can help states build systems that reflect program priorities and support more effective implementation.

The conversation features perspectives from Medicaid leaders in North Carolina and Alaska with experience guiding technology strategy and implementation:

• Sarah Gregosky, chief operating officer, North Carolina Medicaid
• Emily Ricci, Alaska Medicaid director and deputy commissioner, Alaska Department of Health

The episode is hosted by Mark Larson, senior vice president, Center for Health Care Strategies (CHCS), and former Vermont Medicaid director, and Kate McEvoy, executive director, National Association of Medicaid Directors (NAMD) and former Connecticut Medicaid director. The Medicaid Leadership Exchange podcast, an initiative of CHCS’ National Medicaid Leadership Center, explores priority topics for Medicaid leaders. It is jointly developed by NAMD and CHCS. The 2026 season is funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

^{Allow up to 20 seconds for audio playback to begin.}

Featured in this episode:

	Mark Larson, senior vice president, Leadership and Capacity Building, CHCS, and former Vermont Medicaid director		Kate McEvoy, executive director, NAMD, and former Connecticut Medicaid director
	Sarah Gregosky, chief operating officer, North Carolina Medicaid		Emily Ricci, Alaska Medicaid director and deputy commissioner, Alaska Department of Health

---

Visit the series page for additional episodes, or listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or wherever you subscribe to podcasts.

Support for this podcast was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation.